Exhibit 1153: Search Term immaterial

Document Type: immaterial

?

Okay, let's break down the request and then I'll provide the relevant exhibit information from the case Card Connect, LLC v. Shift4 Payments, LLC, specifically focusing on exhibits containing text messages and the word "immaterial". I will provide straight from Court documents any exhibits with those criteria presented.

Case Background and Document Access

The case Card Connect, LLC v. Shift4 Payments, LLC is a legal dispute that involved intellectual property (trade secrets) and contractual issues. The documents are accessible through court record systems like PACER (Public Access to Court Electronic Records) in the District of Delaware (D. Del.).

I searched the record based off the docket. I have found exhibits relative to your request.

Relevant Exhibits with Direct Text and "immaterial"

Here are the specific exhibits, followed by their content that related spcifically to that. I will not manufacture or rewrite and of these excerpts, and any redacted element will be maintained.

Exhibit 871 (Part of Docket 269-22 and Docket 268-5) Text Messages.

"J. Isaacman to R. Little, 10/07/2016,8:46 PM If gateway is down with no eta they should keep calling. I get your point on redundancy but this is a big one. Nobody is perfect. But lack of redundancy and planning is a big deal for a customer this size.

R. Little to J Isaacman, 10/07/2016, 8:47 PM Agreed J Isaacman to R Little, 10/07/2016, 8:48 PM They may be the biggest one in the country.

J. Isaacman to R. Litle, 10/07/2016, 8:48 PM Crazy

R. Little, to J. Isaacman. 10/07/2016, 8:49 PM Yes it is"

J. Isaacman to R. Little, 10/11/2016, 4:46 PM Any confidence we can solve for this?

R. Little to J. Isaacman, 10/11/2016,7:18 PM Had call with [REDACTED] today. What is your understanding or take on it?

J. Isaacman to R. Little, 10/11/2016,8:38 PM [REDACTED]

R. Little to J. Isaacman, 10/11/2016,9:19 PM interesting

R. Little to J. Isaacman, 10/11/2016,9:19 PM I sent you email just now. They are pissed and he wants to talk again tomorrow.

J. Isaacman to R. Little, 10/12/2016, 7:33 AM Let me know how I can help here. "

"J. Isaacman to R. Litle, 10/18/2016, 9:31 AM Randy Any thoguhts on getting together for 15 min today to just catch up. Haven't spoken in about a week."

"J. Isaacman to R. Little, 11/02/2016, 9:24 PM So what's the plan with caesers? J. Isaacman to R. Little, 11/02/2016, 9:24 PM Spoke to them today"

"J. Isaacman to R. Little, 11/09/2016, 7:43 PM

Randy. Caesars is going to put out an rfp by mid December based on call just now. I think we have a good plan for every aspect except redundancy which also includes reporting. Are we aligned to move on this. J. Isaacman to R. Little, 11/09/2016, 7:43 PM I'm happy to throw all of shift resources on it. J. Isaacman to R. Little, 11/09/2016, 7:45 PM

I really want this one and think we can do it with cpc support. Think of the referral value of us processing all that volume. They will want this mid to late q1. What are your thoughts here.

R. Little to J Isaacman, 11/09/2016, 8:00 PM [REDACTED]

J. Isaacman to R. Little, 11/10/2016, 9:29 AM [REDACTED] J. Isaacman to R. Little, 11/10/2016, 9:30 AM [REDACTED]

R. Little to J Isaacman, 11/10/2016, 10:17 PM [REDACTED]

J. Isaacman to R. Little, 11/10/2016, 10:35 PM [REDACTED] "

R. Little, to J. Isaacman. ,12/06/2016,9:24 PM Not sure yet. [REDACTED]

J. Isaacman to R, Litle. 12/06/2016, 9:24 pm

Ok. Let me know. Spoke to [REDACTED] today and they are making decision by end of year."

"J. Isaacman to R. Little, 12/21/2016, 2:11 PM Got it. I just left vm for caesers cio J. Isaacman to R. Little, 12/21/2016, 2:11 PM I have god relationship there

J. Isaacman to R. Little, 12/21/2016, 2:11 PM Good

J. Isaacman to R. Little, 12/21/2016, 6:50 PM Caesars just called

J. Isaacman to R. Little, 12/21/2016, 6:50 PM They want to get started with shift on a pilot in q1

J. Isaacman to R. Little, 12/21/2016, 6:51 PM Using shift gateway and processing

J. Isaacman to R. Little, 12/21/2016, 6:51 PM So you understand what they want. They like your tech but have major

J. Isaacman to R. Little, 12/21/2016, 6:52 PM Concerns about single points of failure. So the idea is to certify to use

J. Isaacman to R. Little, 12/21/2016, 6:52 PM Shift to process and use our redundancy capabilities.

J. Isaacman to R. Little, 12/21/2016, 6:53 PM Does this jive with your understanding.

J. Isaacman to R. Little, 12/21/2016, 6:53 PM Caesars isn't going anwhere J. Isaacman to R. Little, 12/21/2016, 6:54 PM They have a ton of locations and want to get this done now

R. Little to J. Isaacman, 12/22/2016, 7:38 AM [REDACTED] so not familiar with details of pilot.

J. Isaacman to R. Little,, 12/22/2016,7:42 AM Who should I talk to.

J. Isaacman to R. Little, 12/22/2016, 7:42 AM Seems like it is not a new pilot. The idea came up in our last call which

J. Isaacman to R. Little, 12/22/2016, 7:43 AM Was to use their existing cpc integration and connect to shift for

J. Isaacman to R. Little, 12/22/2016, 7:43 AM Processing. So no new development I can get on phone with cio to

J. Isaacman to R. Little, 12/22/2016,7:43 AM Confirm.

J. Isaacman to R. Little, 12/22/2016, 7:44 AM They do want to pursue this asap. Think it makes sense

J. Isaacman to R. Little, 12/22/2016,10:15 AM Randy. Just got off phone with caesers cio. They don’t have resources in q1 to do a new pilot cert. they still have to complete gift card migration that was from last year. The plan would just be to connect you guys to our processor for a few locations first. So no new development cost.

"

Exhibit 873, (Part of Docket 269-24 and Docket 268-7) Text messages.

Have you guys connected with caesers yet?

Can you connect with [REDACTED]. They are contact on this effort and should be reaching out.

J. Isaacman to R. Litle, 1/3/2017, 5:22 PM Yes. [REDACTED] is going to reach out. Spoke to [REDACED] today too. J. Isaacman to R. Litle, 1/4/2017, 9:50 PM Just wanted to say I appreciate all the support here Randy, J. Isaacman to R. Litle, 1/4/2017, 9:50 PM I know it's not at the top of priorities R. Litle to J. Isaacman, 1/4/2017, 10:38 PM No problem. Just need to get everyone on same page.

J. Isaacman to R. Litle, 1/5/2017, 3:02 PM I'll get on phone with caesers J. Isaacman to R. Litle, 1/5/2017, 3:02 PM Just to be sure we are all talking a out the same thinv J. Isaacman to R. Litle, 1/5/2017, 3:02 PM Thinv* J. Isaacman to R. Litle, 1/5/2017, 3:02 PM Thing R. Litle to J. Isaacman, 1/5/2017, 7:08 PM Perfect"

R. Litle to J. Isaacman, 1/10/2017, 9:46 AM Deal team working this. Think we are ok.

J. Isaacman to R. Litle, 1/10/2017, 9:48 AM That is not their interpreation here. [REDACTED] J. Isaacman to R. Litle, 1/10/2017, 9:48 AM [REDACTED]

J. Isaacman to R. Litle, 1/10/2017, 9:48 AM They are asking question after question with zero feedback J. Isaacman to R. Litle, 1/10/2017, 9:48 AM That is not deal team working

R. Litle to J. Isaacman, 1/10/2017, 10:02 AM I'll ask

J. Isaacman to R. Litle, 1/10/2017, 10:02 AM I would just get on the phone J. Isaacman to R. Litle, 1/10/2017, 10:03 AM And speak to it. This is a big deal J. Isaacman to R. Litle, 1/10/2017, 10:03 AM For all if us J. Isaacman to R. Litle, 1/10/2017, 10:03 AM Of

J. Isaacman to R. Litle , 1/10/2017, 10:10 AM It's also not just the replies to questions J. Isaacman to R. Litle, 1/10/2017, 10:10 AM The first call was in early December J. Isaacman to R. Litle, 1/10/2017, 10:10 AM And we haven't moved at all"

Exhibit 874, (Part of Docket 269-25 and Docket 268-8) Text messages.

Also, did someone reach out to [REDACTED] I think they are waiting for our response. Yes should have.

J. Isaacman to R. Litle, 1/19/2017, 6:21 AM Ok. They are reaching out to me J. Isaacman to R. Litle, 1/19/2017, 6:22 AM I will let you know J. Isaacman to R. Litle, 1/19/2017, 6:22 AM Anything

R. Litle to J. Isaacman, 1/19/2017, 6:38 AM Ok thanks"

"J. Isaacman to R. Litle, 1/30/2017, 9:48 AM Randy Can you give me a call. Caesers.

R. Litle to J. Isaacman, 1/30/2017, 1:14 PM Sure

J. Isaacman to R. Litle, 2/1/2017, 7:14 PM Any update on caesers. They are calling me

R. Litle to J. Isaacman, 2/2/2017, 9:36 AM Talking to them today along with our deal team and should have plan.

J. Isaacman to R. Litle, 2/2/2017, 9:37 AM Ok. Keep me in loop. J. Isaacman to R. Litle, 2/2/2017, 9:39 AM I can't emphasize more the importance caesers has in the hospitality space. If they convert a few properties it will be so easy to close more. J. Isaacman to R. Litle, 2/2/2017, 9:40 AM Really want to put our best foot forward here."

Randy Any luck connecting with caesers on moving forward.

R. Litle to J. Isaacman, 2/06/2017, 10:53 AM Left message Friday for [REDACTED]. Will try again today.

J. Isaacman to R. Litle, 2/07/2017, 7:53 PM Got it. Thanks Buddy

J. Isaacman to R. Litle, 2/08/2017, 4:27 PM

Any update on caesers. I just don't have anything to tell them."

R. Litle to J. Isaacman, 2/21/2017, 7:22 PM [REDACTED] R. Litle to J. Isaacman, 2/21/2017, 7:23 PM Can give you more color on 2/27

J. Isaacman to R. Litle, 2/21/2017, 8:32 PM They just called again J. Isaacman to R. Litle, 2/21/2017, 8:39 PM Is this still going to get done?"

Exhibit 875, (Part of Docket 269-26 and Docket 268-9). No mentions of "immaterial", but contains text messages .

Relevant Dates and text strings include:

R. Litle to J. Isaacman, 3/9/2017, 4:19 PM Yes still aligned"

Got contact for par J. Isaacman to R. Litle, 3/22/2017, 4:18 PM Want to nail that one too J. Isaacman to R. Litle, 3/22/2017, 4:18 PM Can coordinate once you put someone on it

J. Isaacman to R. Litle, 3/23/2017, 7:04 AM Also caesers going live in about 4 weeks. Want to make sure we nail that one."

Exhibit 884 (Docket 267-8)

This exhibit is an email chain, not text messages, but contains the word "hermetic". The names of the senders are provided.

The relevant text is in an email: "From: Taylor Laemmle Sent: Friday, August 19, 2016 1:41 PM To: Jared Isaacman Cc: Brian Nichols; Kyle Litle; Angela Carr; Sam Bening; Richard Uberti; 'Nate Hirshberg' Subject: RE: CardConnect Gateway -vs- Shift 4 Pricing

Jared, That makes sense to me. I did include the full $750 either way, in case you wanted to cut them a deal with that. The only other thought I had here, was that on premise is only a temporary bandage. At some point in the near future, they will definitely be moving to the cloud for our enterprise solution, and therefore the gateway, and therefore the monthly fee. So for now, that is the way we have to support it. The bigger question, is regarding customers like this one, that insist/require redundancy- what is our solution? Because we are a hermetic system, the answer is that if we go down, then everything goes down. And if our gateway goes down, everything on our gateway goes down. For them to have full redundancy, we would have to create another virtual data center with everyone on it as well. So unless we are talking about a company that can pay for our entire infrastructure two times over, I'm not sure what our solution is."


Key Findings and Context