Exhibit 8630: Search Term fraud" and those from "Isaac,

Document Type: fraud" and those from "Isaac,

?

Okay, let's break down the request and then present the information from the court documents in Card Connect, LLC v. Shift4 Payments, LLC. This was a complex case with many exhibits, and sifting through them for specific emails, especially those mentioning "fraud" and those from "Isaac," requires careful attention to the provided documents.

Key Points and Context

a very relevant excerpt, focusing on spoliation (destruction of evidence), which often has fraud undertones:

Exhibit: shift4-payments-llc-v-fiserv-et-al-dckt-221_exhibit-q.pdf

This is a declaration of I. Van Zucker.

Here is relevant content, as requested (keeping redactions intact):

Email 1: Isaacman to Various Recipients (Discussion of "Level 1" and Deletion)

the document shows that "I. Van Zucker.  I am over the age of eighteen and am competent to make this Declaration.  I have personal knowledge of all of the facts stated herein, and if called as a witness, could and would testify competently to such facts"

below is an excerpt.

Email Chain:

From: Isaacman, Jared Sent: Monday, October 15, 2018 3:44 PM To: [Redacted] Cc: [Redacted] Subject: RE: CardConnect response to our request

[...previous emails in the chain redacted...]

I just want to make sure we are really only talking about merchants submitting >$100k per month we are talking about removing. In addition, anything in level 1 that falls into that category should also get booted.

I am going to get rid of all these files right after this so please communicate with accounting to address anything that is needed from a reconciliation perspective.

Also, the fraud monitoring tools should have prevented this to begin with so can someone from risk get on this.

Thanks, Jared

-----Original Message----- [rest of email is redacted].

Exhibit : shift4-payments-llc-v-fiserv-et-al-dckt-221_exhibit-r.pdf

This document is relevant because:

Email Chain (Selected Parts):

From: Isaacman, Jared Sent: Monday, October 15, 2018 3:44 PM To: [Redacted] Cc: [Redacted] Subject: RE: CardConnect response to our request [...previous emails in the chain redacted...]

I just want to make sure we are really only talking about merchants submitting >$100k per month we are talking about removing. In addition, anything in level 1 that falls into that category should also get booted.

I am going to get rid of all these files right after this so please communicate with accounting to address anything that is needed from a reconciliation perspective.

Also, the fraud monitoring tools should have prevented this to begin with so can someone from risk get on this.

Thanks, Jared

-----Original Message----- From: [Redacted] Sent: Monday, October 15, 2018 3:40 PM To: Isaacman, Jared jisaacman@shift4.com; [Redacted] Subject: RE: CardConnect response to our request

Looks like of the 45 merchants, only 6 had volume over $100k/month, those are the merchants we recommended be removed.

As far as Prohibited Merchants are concerned in the high risk L1 portfolio, there are 82 merchants, with an average monthly volume of $30,591. These merchants will be reviewed for termination as well. *Important Considerations and Next Steps