Exhibit 9970: Search Term This case concerns a dispute over a contract. Card Connect, LLC sues Shift4 Payments, LLC for breach of contract, declaratory judgment, and promissory estoppel based on Shift4's alleged failure to pay Card Connect residuals pursuant to an Agent Agreement that the parties executed.

Document Type: This case concerns a dispute over a contract. Card Connect, LLC sues Shift4 Payments, LLC for breach

?

Okay, here's a compilation of quotes from the Memorandum Opinion in Card Connect, LLC v. Shift4 Payments, LLC, Case No. 2:23-cv-00267-JDW, aiming for maximum token usage. I've organized them thematically and tried to include a variety of quotes, from factual statements to legal conclusions, to give a comprehensive overview of the document's contents:

I. Introduction and Background:

II. Factual Allegations and Contractual Provisions:

III. Legal Arguments and Analysis (Shift4's Arguments):

IV. Legal Arguments and Analysis (Card Connect's Arguments, and Court's Reasoning):

V. Court's Conclusions and Rulings:

VI. Declaratory Judgment & Good Faith/Fair Dealing:

This extensive collection of quotes provides a detailed picture of the case's core issues, the parties' arguments, and the court's reasoning. It highlights the central ambiguity in the contract and the court's decision to allow the case to proceed to discovery, except the limited dismissal of the pre-termination underpayment claim, the declaratory judgement and the good faith/fair dealing claim. And allowing the claim for punitive damages to proceed.